Indigeneity is the Absence of India

Aqui Thami

The fifth volume of Prabuddha: Journal of Social Equality has been published and it carries articles by women authors from anti-caste thought and indigenous radical movements in the USA. SAVARI is happy to share an excerpt from: Indigeneity is the Absence of India, Prabuddha: Journal Of  Social Equality, 5(1), 23-30

Abstract: Through the metaphor of visiting Gorkhaland this paper raises questions on the impact of the formation of colonialism, borders, and nation-states on historically mobile communities. It provides an insight into how a region and its people imagine their history and future outside the existing nation-state while continuing to negotiate with the present marred in blood and state-led violence. The paper further informs about the politics that unfold around ethnicity, linguistic, regional and indigenous identities in the wake of the totalitarian state.

[…] Once the British marked their territories and all these treaties were signed, some very interesting things happened. For the first time, there was a concept of citizenship among the Himalayan people that  did  not  exist  before  this.  Suddenly,  there  were  questions  being  asked  and  people  being recorded  as  citizens  and  non-citizens,  as  foreigners  and  migrants.  These  things  were  not  done previously  because  a  large  part  of  indigenous  communities  were  just  mobile  communities  who would  be  walking  across invisible  borders  that  were  drawn  afterwards.  The  developmental strategies  were  enforced  with  the  establishment  of  tea  gardens  and  projects  like  cinchona plantation, hydroelectricity projects etc. For this they needed a lot of labour and that is how they started enlisting people as plantation slave laborers. That culture still continues. After the British left, the tea gardens came to be owned by the Bengali upper-caste people or corporates. The same group  of  people  who  worked  in  the  tea  gardens  continued to  work  there.  Even  though  we  had different  kinds  of  colonizers  coming  in,  it  was  the  British,  who,  for  the  first  time  changed  the topography of this land and actually started using spaces that were considered holy or sacred spaces by indigenous communities. We also had a lot of conversions. This was actually the third set of conversions. Our ancestors were made to go through forceful conversions by the Chogyals and the Tibetan Buddhists. After that, there were the Hindu kings, and then the Christian missionaries that came from England and other places. In between somewhere, there were the Mughals, and that is why we have some populations of Muslims too.

When  the  British  left,  Darjeeling  was  a  part  of  East  Pakistan  for  three  days.  When  we  got independence from the British, we did not have the Indian flag up, we actually had the Pakistani flag up for three days, and after three days it was India’s flag. So it was dealt with without any seriousness. They did not really understand the economic viability of the space in the beginning, and  later  on,  they  looked  at  how  important  Darjeeling  tea  would  be.  Eventually,  tourism  would become very important for this part after the division of Bengal.

After  the  Indian  independence  is  when  our  people  and  communities  started  facing  brutal, militarized violence. There were a lot of killings in the tea gardens. In the 1950s, the first tea garden rebellion occurred at Margaret’s Hope tea garden where they killed five people including one minor and one pregnant woman. Since then, it has never stopped. It has only gotten worse. During the 1970s, people started asking for recognition of the language in the Indian constitution, and then again, the Indian military was sent in. But the most brutal of them was in the 1980s where, even according to the figures of the state government there were 1200 people killed in one year between 1986 to 1987 under the Gorkhaland agitation that was led by Subhash Ghising. They sent battalion after battalion of military and paramilitary forces. Men had to hide underground. What my mother and aunts tell me is that almost all the women were raped, but obviously, there is no after-care or trauma-redressal.  This Happened under the communist regime of Bengal.  We do not really hear about these things in the popular discourse. It was in 1988, some thirty years ago, that they signed an  agreement with the Bengal government for the formation of the Darjeeling Gorkha Autonomous Hill  Council. It   sounds like a great name but there is   no  autonomy.  It  was created so that the agitations would stop. That went on for some time and some agreements were made with Subhash Ghising, who  led  the  Gorkha National Liberation Front  (GNLF) party.   When it started it  wasn’t really   a political party;   it  was   a people’s party   for them to come together, articulate, form groups  and resist. But obviously,  when  the  government  got involved, it quickly  turned into  a political party, and then they started participating in elections and other things, after the agreement was signed for DGHC. It went on for a couple of years. In between, there would be something that the Bengal government was not happy with, and suddenly they would blackout the entire region and bring in the army. As kids, we would hear choppers over our houses. We wouldn’t know what was going on. And then, after a few days, things would be normal. Schools would reopen and there would be no bandh. That went on for quite some time, and then, in 2007 there was a huge coming together of people, and it was again the same thing. [..]

Read the full article here: Thami, A. (2021). Indigeneity is the Absence of India. Prabuddha: Journal Of Social Equality, 5(1), 23-30.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Protected by WP Anti Spam
facebook marketing